Reviews and Comments on Literary Responses to Catastrophe, A Comparison of the Armenian and the Jewish Experience

 

Reviews:

Ալիք-ի խմբագրութիւն, «Հրատարակւեց Ռ․ Փիրումեանի «Գրական Անդրադարձներ Աղէտին» հատորը», Ալիք, 30 Հոկտեմբեր, 1993, էջ 5

(click here to download pdf)

Ռիթա Որբերեան, «Մունջ՝ Աղէտին Դիմաց», Ասպարէզ, 9 Յուլիս, 1994, էջ 14-15

(click here to download pdf)

Յակոբ Կարապենց, «Ցեղասպանութեան Դատի Միջազգայնացումը», Նոր Կեանք, թիւ 48, Հոկտեմբեր, 1993

(click here to download pdf)

Dr. G. M. Goshgarian,  University of Burgundy,in Armenian Review, Winter 1992, Vol. 45, No. 4/180

(click here to download pdf)

Յ․ Քիւրքճեան, «Աղէտին Արձագանգումները Գրականութեան Մէջ», Դրօշակ, թիւ11, Սեպտեմբեր, 1994, էջ 10-12

(click here to download pdf)

Gayane Mergerian, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, in Ararat Quarterly, winter, 1996, pp.66-67

(click here to download pdf)

Aris G. Sevag, “Comparison between Armenian and Jewish Responses to Catastrophe in Literature,” Asbarez, April 23, 1996, pp. 2-3

(click here to download pdf)

Comments:

“Your wonderful book, Literary Responses to Catastrophe just arrived. And I started, before reading the rest of the mail, to just peruse. But before I knew it hours had gone by! 

It must have been a very doleful immersion, as you say, to produce this necessary work. But it is so vital and necessary.

And our people should be so grateful. I know I am…”

Diana Der-Hovannessian

Cambridge, MA

“Without telling you of my enormous admiration for your literary responses to our catastrophe. I envy your style (smooth and clear) which does not often accompany depth of thought and discernment. Believe it, this reader learned a great deal! (to mention just one aspect – the theme of martyrdom and its secularization). Thank you so much for that, especially your insights are terrific.”

Love, Marje

(Dr. Marjory Housepian Dopkin, Columbia University, New York)

“Pluridisciplinary is an important characteristic of Peroomian’s work. Focused on historical events and phenomena and their echoes in literature, she uses analytical methods of not only historio-literary criticism, but also those in various disciplines, cultural, ethnic, and social sciences.”

H. Kiurkchian

Athens, Greece